Online narratives as a security concern
Security briefings ahead of the March 5 polls have increasingly highlighted disinformation as a risk alongside physical threats. Officials note that false messages about changes in polling dates, armed groups, or fabricated incidents can spread quickly through messaging apps and social media. In the tense context following the Gen-Z protests, even small rumours can trigger fear and localised unrest.
Monitoring and response mechanisms
According to the Integrated Election Security Plan, security agencies and the Election Commission will share information on viral content that could incite violence or suppress voting. While authorities say they will not monitor private communications indiscriminately, they are working with social media companies, civil society fact-checkers, and local administrations to flag and correct harmful falsehoods. The emphasis is on timely clarification through official channels rather than heavy-handed censorship.
Role of citizens and media
Citizens are encouraged to verify sensational claims with trusted news outlets or official notices before sharing them. Independent media and fact-checking organisations are expected to play a critical role in debunking rumours and explaining complex procedures clearly. The Leaders’ daily fact-check section is designed to support this ecosystem by scrutinising viral election-related claims.